Decision Infrastructure under Uncertainty

Decisions under uncertainty.
Without guessing.

Open-source platform for due diligence, M&A risk, OSINT and CER/NIS2 compliance. 552 autonomous agents, 228 commands, 92 umbrella apps. Evidence in. Hypotheses compete. Scores computed deterministically. Every recommendation traceable to source.

128+ OSINT Sources | 552 AIAD Agents | 19-Pillar Doctrine
prismatic.risk.engine
LIVE
Composite Risk Score
+ 4 more dimensions on desktop
128+ OSINT sources assessed Updated 2s ago
OSINT Sources
Signals / Day
Score Latency
100%
Audit Trail
Platform v19.0.0 — Live

Platform at a glance.

A production-grade decision engine, not a slide deck. Every number measurable via mix prismatic.stats.

AIAD Agents
Specialized autonomous agents across all domains
AIAD Commands
Domain-language operations, scriptable workflows
Umbrella Apps
Independent OTP applications, hot-loadable
Doctrine Pillars
Pre-commit + CI enforcement, zero compromise
Architecture · 3NL Framework

Three nested layers. Composable. Replaceable.

Data · Logic · Presentation. Each layer is an independent OTP application contract. Hot-loadable, hot-swappable, individually testable.

prismatic.architecture
3NL
graph TB subgraph L3["L3 — Presentation"] LV[LiveView Dashboards] API[Auto-Introspecting API] end subgraph L2["L2 — Logic and Reasoning"] AGENTS[552 AIAD Agents] NABLA[NABLA Infinity] TRINITY[Trinity Gate] end subgraph L1["L1 — Data Substrate"] PG[(PostgreSQL)] ETS[(ETS Cache)] MEILI[(Meilisearch)] KUZU[(KuzuDB Graph)] end LV --> AGENTS API --> AGENTS AGENTS --> NABLA NABLA --> TRINITY TRINITY --> PG AGENTS --> ETS AGENTS --> MEILI AGENTS --> KUZU classDef l1 fill:#1e3a8a,stroke:#3b82f6,color:#fff classDef l2 fill:#7c2d12,stroke:#f97316,color:#fff classDef l3 fill:#14532d,stroke:#10b981,color:#fff class PG,ETS,MEILI,KUZU l1 class AGENTS,NABLA,TRINITY l2 class LV,API l3

Hot-loadable · Independently scalable · Contract-tested adapters

platform.composition
v19
552
Agents
228
Commands
92
Apps
128+
OSINT

Decisions without evidence are liabilities.

Boards demand quantified cyber risk. Regulators demand audit trails. Insurers demand evidence. Most organizations still rely on spreadsheets, vendor questionnaires, and opaque third-party scores that collapse under regulatory scrutiny.

Financial Exposure

Average data breach costs EUR 4.45M. Regulatory fines under NIS2 reach 2% of global revenue. Unquantified risk means unmanaged capital exposure.

Reputational Damage

Supplier breaches cascade. A single compromised vendor can expose your entire customer base. Reactive monitoring is too slow.

Regulatory Pressure

NIS2 requires evidence-based risk assessment, not vendor questionnaires. Regulators reject scores without traceable methodology.

Not another dashboard. A scoring engine.

Structured risk quantification,
not aggregated opinions.

Every score is traceable to source evidence. Every anomaly is explainable. Every assessment is audit-ready.

Pipeline-Based Inference

Signals flow through a deterministic scoring pipeline. No black-box models. Every risk factor maps to a specific evidence chain with provenance timestamps.

Behavioral Anomaly Detection

Statistical baseline comparison using Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Detects drift in supplier security posture, configuration changes, and certificate anomalies before they become incidents.

Audit-Ready Evidence

Every score links to timestamped, source-attributed evidence. Regulators can trace any risk factor from board report to raw signal. Full provenance chain, no black boxes.

Governance-First Architecture

Built for regulated industries. Workspace isolation ensures data separation between entities. Role-based access, immutable audit logs, and automated compliance reporting from day one.

Workspace Isolation

Multi-tenant by design. Each client workspace has isolated data, separate scoring contexts, and independent audit trails. No cross-contamination between assessments.

Explainable Risk Outputs

Scores decompose into human-readable factors. Board members see letter grades. Analysts see contributing signals. Auditors see evidence chains. Same data, three views.

Board-Ready Reporting

From 128+ signal sources
to one board slide.

Prismatic ingests intelligence from domain records, certificate transparency logs, breach databases, public registries, plus 34 Czech-specific and 14 EU sources. The scoring engine distills this into a single composite rating with drill-down capability to any contributing factor.

Security Ratings A-F

Numeric scores (300-900) with letter grade mapping. Industry percentile benchmarking.

Continuous Monitoring

Real-time alerting on attack surface changes, certificate expirations, compliance drift.

Compliance Mapping

Automated NIS2 Article mapping, ZKB 264/2025 Sb. gap analysis, evidence export.

risk.dimensions
A
External
B+
Supplier
B
Compliance

How Prismatic compares.

Incumbents produce scores. Prismatic produces evidence-backed risk quantification.

Capability BitSight / SecurityScorecard Prismatic
Score methodology transparencyProprietary, opaqueOpen, auditable
Evidence chain to raw signalPartialComplete provenance
Behavioral anomaly detectionNoKS-test baselines
NIS2 compliance mappingAdd-on moduleBuilt-in, article-level
Workspace isolationShared tenantFull isolation
Typical ACVEUR 80-250KEUR 40-120K
Capability Black Kite / RiskRecon Prismatic
Risk quantification methodologyAggregated signalsStructured scoring pipeline
Supplier behavioral monitoringPeriodic snapshotContinuous, drift-aware
Czech/CEE registry integrationNone34 Czech + 14 EU sources
Due diligence automationSeparate productIntegrated pipeline
Deployment modelSaaS onlySaaS, on-prem, air-gapped
Capability Credo AI / Holistic AI Prismatic
AI decision drift monitoringModel-specificCross-system behavioral
External risk integrationNone128+ OSINT sources
Epistemic rigor frameworkBest-effortFormally verified (Lean4)
Compliance scopeAI-specific regulationsAI + cyber + governance
Board-level reportingTechnical dashboardsCFO-grade risk outputs

Board-level outcomes.

Quantified impact across financial, operational, and regulatory dimensions.

60-80%
Faster Risk Assessment
vs manual vendor questionnaire process
40-60%
Compliance Cost Reduction
automated evidence collection + reporting
3-5x
More Suppliers Monitored
continuous vs annual review cycle
100%
Audit Trail Coverage
every score traceable to source evidence
Ideal Customer Profile

Built for regulated enterprises
managing external risk.

Prismatic serves organizations where cyber risk has board visibility, supplier ecosystems create material exposure, and regulatory compliance requires evidence-based assessment.

Common Trigger Events

M&A due diligence requiring automated risk assessment
NIS2 / DORA / ZKB 264/2025 Sb. compliance deadline
Supplier breach impacting operations
Board requesting quantified cyber risk reporting

Company Profile

RevenueEUR 50M - 5B
Employees500 - 50,000
Suppliers monitored50 - 5,000+
Regulatory environmentNIS2, DORA, ZKB

Industries

Financial Services Manufacturing Healthcare Critical Infrastructure Public Sector Technology

Budget Holders

CISO / VP Information Security
Chief Risk Officer
VP Procurement / Supply Chain
CFO (for quantified risk reporting)
Category Definition

Behavioral Risk Intelligence

Behavioral Risk Intelligence is the practice of continuously quantifying organizational risk exposure through structured analysis of external signals, supplier behavior patterns, and regulatory compliance posture. Unlike traditional security ratings that produce static scores, BRI systems maintain audit-ready evidence chains, detect behavioral drift in third-party ecosystems, and generate explainable risk outputs suitable for board-level decision-making and regulatory submission.

Prismatic defines and leads this category by combining external attack surface management, OSINT-powered due diligence, and AI drift monitoring into a single governance-first platform with deterministic, evidence-backed scoring.

Engineering Cadence — 2026

Shipping evidence, not roadmaps.

Public milestones from the platform's continuous evolution. No marketing dates — every entry traceable to a commit.

Built on fault-tolerant infrastructure.

Elixir/OTP runtime provides fault isolation, hot code reloading, and sub-millisecond process spawning. No single-point-of-failure architecture. Designed for continuous operation in regulated environments.

Runtime
BEAM VM (Erlang/OTP)
Storage
PostgreSQL + KuzuDB
Deployment
SaaS, On-Prem, Air-Gap
AI Inference
Local (Ollama) or Cloud
prismatic risk-engine
$ prismatic assess --target acme-corp.com
[1/4] Scanning external attack surface...
[2/4] Querying 128+ intelligence sources...
[3/4] Running behavioral anomaly detection...
[4/4] Generating compliance report...
Assessment Complete:
Security Rating: A (847/900)
NIS2 Compliance: 94.2%
Anomalies Found: 2 (low severity)
Evidence Items: 1,247
Report: ./reports/acme-corp-2026-02.pdf
$ |
Start Here

External Risk Assessment

Smallest viable entry: score your external attack surface and top 20 suppliers. Audit-ready report delivered in 48 hours. No integration required.

  • Attack surface discovery
  • Security rating (A-F) with evidence
  • NIS2 gap analysis
  • Board-ready PDF report
Request Assessment
Full Platform

Continuous Risk Intelligence

Full platform deployment: continuous monitoring, supplier ecosystem scoring, behavioral anomaly detection, and automated compliance reporting.

  • Unlimited supplier monitoring
  • Real-time drift detection
  • Due diligence automation
  • API access + workspace isolation
Calculate ROI